Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
Choosing Sides
Today I had the experience of spending some time in the waiting area at the Newport News Juvenile & Domestic Relations District Court. It did show some examples of humanity at its worst.
First of all, a court is no place for children. Yet the waiting area was filled with kids. They were there to see their parents fight over them. Both in and out of the courtroom.
There also were the grandparents who were in charge of taking care of their grandchildren, as well as their own children- some of whom were in their 40's. No person in their 60's or 70's should have to be responsible for two generations of their family.
Worst of all were the parents who were trying to entice their children to sit with one or the other of them-to pick sides. After the sides were picked they would then look over at those on the other side conspiratorially and whisper.
Children should never be put in the middle or be made to feel like they have to pick sides. Sometimes it does not even take words to make them feel that they are being disloyal to a parent by enjoying a visit with the other parent or having a phone conversation. This is wrong! It is a parent's duty to behave appropriately and to encourage contact with and love for the other parent-even if it hurts to do it.
First of all, a court is no place for children. Yet the waiting area was filled with kids. They were there to see their parents fight over them. Both in and out of the courtroom.
There also were the grandparents who were in charge of taking care of their grandchildren, as well as their own children- some of whom were in their 40's. No person in their 60's or 70's should have to be responsible for two generations of their family.
Worst of all were the parents who were trying to entice their children to sit with one or the other of them-to pick sides. After the sides were picked they would then look over at those on the other side conspiratorially and whisper.
Children should never be put in the middle or be made to feel like they have to pick sides. Sometimes it does not even take words to make them feel that they are being disloyal to a parent by enjoying a visit with the other parent or having a phone conversation. This is wrong! It is a parent's duty to behave appropriately and to encourage contact with and love for the other parent-even if it hurts to do it.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Saturday, July 23, 2011
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
What the Social Security Administration Wants You To Do After Divorce
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/gethelp/gethelp1.htm
Monday, July 18, 2011
Sunday, July 17, 2011
If Restorative Justice Was Used For Casey Anthony
If Restorative Justice Was Used to Handle Casey Anthony, the Outcome Would Be Different
Restorative Justice for Casey Anthony Would Produce a Different Outcome
Published on July 15, 2011 by Key Sun, Ph.D. in The Justice and Responsibility League
The public's reactions to the verdict of Casey Anthony trial indicate that people have the strong need for healing and closure in addition to rage, and want to understand why she did what she did (regardless of the alleged murder or concealing Caylee's death) and the role the dysfunctional family dynamics played in the crime. However, even if the court had convicted Casey of murder, it could not have addressed those psychological and emotional issues, because of the limitations of the adversarial system. Restorative justice, however, can be used to address these needs.
Restorative justice represents a relatively new and alternative approach to administer justice to adult and juvenile offenders in community and in incarceration in the United States. Restorative justice procedures usually involve a face-to-face meeting of the victim, the offender, community, and/or family members for both sides. This approach not only creates the accountability for the offenders but also gives individuals, families, and community most directly impacted by wrongdoing the opportunity to participate in the resolution process and to heal the wounds of the crime. Rooted in indigenous traditions and endorsed by the United Nations, restorative justice has been integrated into the criminal justice processes by many countries. At least 35 States in the U.S. have some legislations concerning restorative justice. However, except a few states (e.g., Minnesota, Pennsylvania) that regulate the application of restorative justice with adult offenders (in addition to the conventional justice system), most of the states (including Florida) confine the practice of restorative justice to nonviolent juvenile offenders.
There are at least three differences between restorative justice and the traditional justice:
1. Restorative justice views crime as a violation of social relationships, whereas the conventional justice system considers crime a violation against the law and society.
2, Restorative justice's primary aim is to restore the victims (broadly defined, including the families and community) materially and psychologically, whereas the conventional justice system focuses on the offender by using punishment and other retributive methods.
3. Restorative justice addresses the emotional and psychological needs of the victim, the family members and the community by creating opportunities for them to express their emotions and to confront the offender in a safe and controlled environment. The interactive communications also include the rebuttal of the offender's denial or attempt for rationalization for the crime. Consequently, the offender experiences feelings of shame regarding the offenses, accepts responsibility, sincerely apologizes, and develops commitment for change. The conventional justice process, however, does not address these psychological issues and does not believe that interpersonal interactions can change the offender. Does anyone know why about 60% convicted offenders re-offend within three years after serving time in prison? Although there are many factors influencing the result, one of the obvious reasons is that the punishment offender received does not help modify his/her distorted cognitions of social reality and does not address the emotional wounds.
If restorative justice could be used to handle Casey Anthony's crime, the most suitable modality would be the community based practice for conflict resolution or community conferencing, which involves the offender, the family members and community members with one or two mental health professionals as the facilitators.
What are the major issues if restorative justice could be applied to Casey Anthony? I think the following issues need to be included:
a) Her feeling toward her daughter Caylee Anthony, including her death.
b) The emotional reactions of the family and community members to the death.
c) Casey's relationships with her mother and father, including the issues of the alleged sexual abuse, jealousy and other dysfunctions.
In essence, effective restorative justice shares some commonality with therapeutic group processes in that it uses human interactions to assess and deal with the participants' psychological needs. The trial of Casey Anthony reveals that the prosecutor, defense lawyer, witnesses, judge and jurors are not the only players who can mete out justice, because it is the psychological mechanisms (cognition, emotions, and motivation) and human relationships that regulate people's actions and serve as a determinant of justice.
Restorative Justice for Casey Anthony Would Produce a Different Outcome
Published on July 15, 2011 by Key Sun, Ph.D. in The Justice and Responsibility League
The public's reactions to the verdict of Casey Anthony trial indicate that people have the strong need for healing and closure in addition to rage, and want to understand why she did what she did (regardless of the alleged murder or concealing Caylee's death) and the role the dysfunctional family dynamics played in the crime. However, even if the court had convicted Casey of murder, it could not have addressed those psychological and emotional issues, because of the limitations of the adversarial system. Restorative justice, however, can be used to address these needs.
Restorative justice represents a relatively new and alternative approach to administer justice to adult and juvenile offenders in community and in incarceration in the United States. Restorative justice procedures usually involve a face-to-face meeting of the victim, the offender, community, and/or family members for both sides. This approach not only creates the accountability for the offenders but also gives individuals, families, and community most directly impacted by wrongdoing the opportunity to participate in the resolution process and to heal the wounds of the crime. Rooted in indigenous traditions and endorsed by the United Nations, restorative justice has been integrated into the criminal justice processes by many countries. At least 35 States in the U.S. have some legislations concerning restorative justice. However, except a few states (e.g., Minnesota, Pennsylvania) that regulate the application of restorative justice with adult offenders (in addition to the conventional justice system), most of the states (including Florida) confine the practice of restorative justice to nonviolent juvenile offenders.
There are at least three differences between restorative justice and the traditional justice:
1. Restorative justice views crime as a violation of social relationships, whereas the conventional justice system considers crime a violation against the law and society.
2, Restorative justice's primary aim is to restore the victims (broadly defined, including the families and community) materially and psychologically, whereas the conventional justice system focuses on the offender by using punishment and other retributive methods.
3. Restorative justice addresses the emotional and psychological needs of the victim, the family members and the community by creating opportunities for them to express their emotions and to confront the offender in a safe and controlled environment. The interactive communications also include the rebuttal of the offender's denial or attempt for rationalization for the crime. Consequently, the offender experiences feelings of shame regarding the offenses, accepts responsibility, sincerely apologizes, and develops commitment for change. The conventional justice process, however, does not address these psychological issues and does not believe that interpersonal interactions can change the offender. Does anyone know why about 60% convicted offenders re-offend within three years after serving time in prison? Although there are many factors influencing the result, one of the obvious reasons is that the punishment offender received does not help modify his/her distorted cognitions of social reality and does not address the emotional wounds.
If restorative justice could be used to handle Casey Anthony's crime, the most suitable modality would be the community based practice for conflict resolution or community conferencing, which involves the offender, the family members and community members with one or two mental health professionals as the facilitators.
What are the major issues if restorative justice could be applied to Casey Anthony? I think the following issues need to be included:
a) Her feeling toward her daughter Caylee Anthony, including her death.
b) The emotional reactions of the family and community members to the death.
c) Casey's relationships with her mother and father, including the issues of the alleged sexual abuse, jealousy and other dysfunctions.
In essence, effective restorative justice shares some commonality with therapeutic group processes in that it uses human interactions to assess and deal with the participants' psychological needs. The trial of Casey Anthony reveals that the prosecutor, defense lawyer, witnesses, judge and jurors are not the only players who can mete out justice, because it is the psychological mechanisms (cognition, emotions, and motivation) and human relationships that regulate people's actions and serve as a determinant of justice.
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Friday, July 15, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Monday, July 11, 2011
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Friday, July 8, 2011
Monday, July 4, 2011
Friday, July 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
